Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | | |
10-18-2018, 01:42 PM
|
#476 | Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,756
Thanked 32,637 Times in 7,615 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 162 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by underscore Based on what? And without changing a single thing? Though by their nature a VI is still completely valid even if the car passes without changes. So unless it's the same officer giving the same vehicle VIs repeatedly then you're not going to get very far.
Except a VI is for anything, not just ride height. I feel like at best this would get thrown out of court, at worst it seems like a fast track to ending up with mandatory annual inspections. Remember how fun AirCare was for everyone?
Out of the people that have passed without changing a thing, how many have gotten more than 1 VI per year? | I don't get the angle you are taking trying to disprove what I'm saying when I'm not implying what I'm saying is fact.
I'll speak some facts here.
Fact: Cars that are not low enough to be considered illegal have been issued VIs for being "too low"
This is easily measurable roadside. You don't even need a ruler to do it. You just need eyes.
Fact: Cars are being issued VIs with zero, or minimal modifications, then passing with zero issues.
Fact: Police officers giving VI's are straight up LYING about the legality of modifications. Telling SW that ALL CAR MODIFICATIONS ARE ILLEGAL is a straight up fucking lie. This is no different than being given a ticket for parking illegally when there is a clear sign that states the parking rules, and being 100% within the legality when you park there.
Now I will clarify what I was speculating by using the information that has been available to me, by making educated guesses based on numbers.
Speculation: There have probably been, based on a guess, through the amount of time elapsed and the participation in this thread a couple hundred VIs given out.
Speculation: Other than rice cookerbois car, and a couple shitty cars I have seen on IG get VI's, most will pass, with no issues. If that number is the case, lets say 100 cars out of 110 pass.
Is that not grounds for the police to be held accountable for arbitrarily telling people they are doing illegal things when they are not? Wheres the line? Can a cop come up to me and tell me I have drugs when I don't and arrest me? Should it be my job to prove innocence when there is no cause for arrest? Should it cost ME money to prove my innocence just because someone felt like being an asshole, to counteract some goofball I don't know that shares a common interest (sort of) with me?
Yes I'm escalating it, but personally, I'd rather pay $500 to a lawyer to get this to stop, than pay nothing and worry about being punished for doing absolutely nothing wrong every time I leave the house.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5 Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever Westopher is correct. | Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked | Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct. | |
| | This post thanked by: | Akinari, alf, AzNightmare, BABU, beebob, Berzerker, BIC_BAWS, coneZONE, freakshow, Hcoreposer, Indy, jpark, korroke, Lancouver, lgman, Matsuda, mj_39, Revbimmer, SkunkWorks, slicrick, ThatKoukiKid, TouringTeg, UnknownJinX, white rocket |
10-18-2018, 02:07 PM
|
#477 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Burn-A-Bee
Posts: 3,991
Thanked 418 Times in 191 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
Not saying that I agree with this, but based on this someone could argue that any aftermarket exhaust which may have tips larger than stock, and/or sound louder than stock violates this part of the MVA: Quote:
Alteration prohibited
(4) No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle propelled by an internal combustion engine equipped with a muffler the exhaust outlet of which has been opened or widened.
Noise increase or flames prohibited
(5) No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle propelled by an internal combustion engine equipped with a muffler or exhaust system to which is attached any device which increases the noise of the expulsion of the gases from the engine or allows a flame to be emitted from the exhaust system.
| Also, regarding being "too low", there's this section: Quote:
Headlamps
4.05 (1) A motor vehicle must be equipped with either one or 2 headlamps mounted on each side of the front of the vehicle and capable of displaying white light.
(2) The headlamps must be mounted at a height of not less than 56 cm and not more than 1.37 m.
| I remember almost getting a VI 15 years ago in Richmond, and this is what the cop cited to me. He only backed off when I told him I would bet him his job that my stock ITR muffler had a Honda stamp on it
__________________ Never argue with a dumbass, they drag you down to their level and try to beat you with experience My Feedback
Blah™
|
| |
10-18-2018, 02:41 PM
|
#478 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: revscene
Posts: 4,344
Thanked 4,863 Times in 1,664 Posts
Failed 165 Times in 63 Posts
|
Westopher is correct, aside from this thread, if you do a search for "VI" on Facebook posts, click "Recent" and select "Your Groups", I'm certain that you'll find more VIs.
Some examples: - Someone's dad's 100% bone stock civic got VI'd for too much camber. It's factory alignment LOL.
- Someone got a VI for amber angel eyes and too much rear camber on a Mazda. Stock has negative camber. (Lowered by 1.5")
- This guy got VI'd for too low and negative camber (Lowered by > 1")
- Someone heavily modified got VI'd. Among the infractions, he got "wheels not OEM". WTF lol
Food for thought, someone said the cop told them that Magnaflow doesn't count as an exhaust. Technically true because it violates MVA. But Magnaflow does make stock equivalent. If the cops are saying that can't have any aftermarket parts, then thats an end of an entire industry. Moreover, people will be forced to buy from Dealer or OEM, if OE spec isn't good enough. Ie. Bosch is a BMW OE mfg. But in this case Bosch is illegal bc it's not stamped BMW.
Also, here's an article in 2015 - Young Gear Heads Say They Are Being Unfairly Targeted By Police
Last edited by BIC_BAWS; 10-18-2018 at 03:07 PM.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 02:56 PM
|
#479 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Van
Posts: 4,800
Thanked 2,014 Times in 1,069 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 128 Posts
|
Does the police only use oem parts on their cars I don't think bull bars, steelies, extra lights are made by Ford or gm
|
| | This post thanked by: | 320icar, Akinari, alf, Allanc, BIC_BAWS, coneZONE, fivetwo, Hcoreposer, nsx042003, R. Mutt, ThatKoukiKid, tofu1413 |
10-18-2018, 02:59 PM
|
#480 | I help report spam so I got this! <--
Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,867
Thanked 1,215 Times in 535 Posts
Failed 275 Times in 114 Posts
|
One idiot doing idiotic thing costing whole car scene tens of thousands dollars in fines and inspection fees. |
| |
10-18-2018, 03:16 PM
|
#481 | Meet on the Level and Part on the Square
Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Squampton
Posts: 1,662
Thanked 2,093 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 187 Times in 69 Posts
|
On cases similar to this, where there is a perception of authority overstepping their legal rights, it is best to contact the BC Ombudsman (now person) and start a formal complaint. Have evidence, speak factual, and it is their job to investigate. Having the police recommending particular shops (in this case the dealer) seems to be a bit of a conflict of interest for starters; it could just as easy be their friends' shops they dictate. http://bcombudsperson.ca/driving-and-transportation |
| |
10-18-2018, 03:21 PM
|
#482 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,193
Thanked 5,428 Times in 864 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 32 Posts
|
Whoa, I agree with Zedbra for a change.
I haven't updated this thread in a while but I have spoken to a reporter who is currently looking into this.
Please keep the updates and facts coming.
PS: I've spoken with two shops about my E30 (one dealer and the other an independent), both said my car will pass as is with no issue.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 03:21 PM
|
#483 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,771
Thanked 582 Times in 173 Posts
Failed 54 Times in 23 Posts
|
This is the latest MVA regulation.
Consolidation current to October 16, 2018 http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/...bc/26_58_multi Muffler
7.03 (1) A motor vehicle propelled by an internal combustion engine shall be equipped
with an exhaust muffler consisting of a series of pipes or chambers which ensures
that the exhaust gases from the engine are cooled and expelled without excessive
noise.
Cut-outs prohibited
(2) No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle propelled by an internal
combustion engine when the muffler with which the vehicle is equipped is cut out
or disconnected from the engine.
Part removal prohibited
(3) No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle propelled by an internal
combustion engine equipped with a muffler from which has been removed any
baffle plate or other part.
Alteration prohibited
(4) No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle propelled by an internal
combustion engine equipped with a muffler the exhaust outlet of which has been
opened or widened.
Noise increase or flames prohibited
(5) No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle propelled by an internal
combustion engine equipped with a muffler or exhaust system to which is
attached any device which increases the noise of the expulsion of the gases from
the engine or allows a flame to be emitted from the exhaust system.
[am. B.C. Reg. 29/59.]
Last edited by ime2006; 10-18-2018 at 03:37 PM.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 03:26 PM
|
#484 | Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,756
Thanked 32,637 Times in 7,615 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 162 Posts
|
So does number 4 mean even the tips can not be larger than stock? Or the piping itself can not be?
4 would basically mean that the exhaust is in fact, basically unable to be modified if its the former.
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5 Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever Westopher is correct. | Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked | Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct. | |
| |
10-18-2018, 03:29 PM
|
#485 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,771
Thanked 582 Times in 173 Posts
Failed 54 Times in 23 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher So does number 4 mean even the tips can not be larger than stock? Or the piping itself can not be?
4 would basically mean that the exhaust is in fact, basically unable to be modified if its the former. | That's correct!!
Which means a lot of my buddies will have to put their mufflers back to stock.
This will cost thousands of dollars to put back in stock form. And Plus, the cost of aftermarket exhaust they spent on. Total lost is more than 10K
And I am thinking
Is it because of the election season, these MVA laws has been updated recently ????
Last edited by ime2006; 10-18-2018 at 03:35 PM.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 03:44 PM
|
#486 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: revscene
Posts: 4,344
Thanked 4,863 Times in 1,664 Posts
Failed 165 Times in 63 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ime2006
And I am thinking
Is it because of the election season, these MVA laws has been updated recently ???? |
"Last amendment made Oct 5, 2018". Based on what I read in the Muffler, Ride Height, Lights, Braking, Noise section, this hasn't changed since I first posted this thread.
I'd assume the only changes that have been made as of late would be to adhere to the Cannabis legalization.
Edit: The following link will show you what has changed between Dec 7, 2017 and Oct 10, 2018 http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/e3tlc96318
Edit 2: Scroll down to M for MVA, and it'll show you amendments: http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/...n/2018cumulati
Last edited by BIC_BAWS; 10-18-2018 at 03:51 PM.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 03:45 PM
|
#487 | To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,798
Thanked 9,482 Times in 4,138 Posts
Failed 429 Times in 227 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher I don't get the angle you are taking trying to disprove what I'm saying when I'm not implying what I'm saying is fact. | My point is that if you're going to go to the extreme of a class action you probably should be using facts, and be thinking big picture (which the guy doxxing a police officer sure as hell didn't do). That's why I mention things like annual inspections. All it takes is the wrong people seeing too much of a fuss being raised over what are technically validly issued VIs (as far as their intended purpose in the gov'ts eyes) and they'll start thinking about the revenue generation from required periodic inspections. That's enough of a headache with a daily, now imagine the guys with 2/3/4/5/etc vehicles doing it for every one. At one point I had 7 cars, so I'm not super jazzed on that idea.
Even then we'd still have VIs because of the guys who get an inspection and then immediately make their vehicle illegal again. Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher Fact: Cars that are not low enough to be considered illegal have been issued VIs for being "too low"
This is easily measurable roadside. You don't even need a ruler to do it. You just need eyes.
Fact: Cars are being issued VIs with zero, or minimal modifications, then passing with zero issues.
Fact: Police officers giving VI's are straight up LYING about the legality of modifications. Telling SW that ALL CAR MODIFICATIONS ARE ILLEGAL is a straight up fucking lie. This is no different than being given a ticket for parking illegally when there is a clear sign that states the parking rules, and being 100% within the legality when you park there. | Fact: Sadly that's how VI's are currently set up to work. A vehicle does not need to be modified to get a VI, an officer just needs to say they suspect something is non-compliant (visible or not) as they aren't mechanics and they aren't going to start doing a full inspection at the side of the road. Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher Speculation: There have probably been, based on a guess, through the amount of time elapsed and the participation in this thread a couple hundred VIs given out.
Speculation: Other than rice cookerbois car, and a couple shitty cars I have seen on IG get VI's, most will pass, with no issues. If that number is the case, lets say 100 cars out of 110 pass. | Those seem like pretty generous numbers given how I've seen peoples VIs go in the past, but based on how the VI system is currently set up even that is completely fine in the gov'ts eyes. You're also assuming the information coming from people is correct, which again given what I've seen in the past a lot of people who say "it's legal" and "it passed without doing anything" are lying. That isn't the case with everyone, but people seem to have a very loose definition of what "changing nothing" is. Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher Is that not grounds for the police to be held accountable for arbitrarily telling people they are doing illegal things when they are not? Wheres the line? Can a cop come up to me and tell me I have drugs when I don't and arrest me? Should it be my job to prove innocence when there is no cause for arrest? Should it cost ME money to prove my innocence just because someone felt like being an asshole, to counteract some goofball I don't know that shares a common interest (sort of) with me?
Yes I'm escalating it, but personally, I'd rather pay $500 to a lawyer to get this to stop, than pay nothing and worry about being punished for doing absolutely nothing wrong every time I leave the house. | The problem here is you're not relating to equivalent things, a VI is simply a referral for an inspection, not an arrest (aside from a box 1, but looking at some of these cars it's like wearing a necklace with a brick of coke hanging off it). I'm not sure what you mean by getting VI's to stop, they'll always exist, and going by how they're currently defined unless the same cop is repeatedly issuing them to the same vehicle you're going to have an extremely difficult (borderline impossible) time proving there is any wrongdoing taking place. It'll certainly cost you a hell of a lot more than $500 to get a lawyer to come up with something that has any hope of going anywhere. Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher So does number 4 mean even the tips can not be larger than stock? Or the piping itself can not be?
4 would basically mean that the exhaust is in fact, basically unable to be modified if its the former. | Even the tips, that's the way it's been forever. The stupid part is that it's purely tip diameter, not cross sectional area. Meaning if you have two tips stock, and swap to a single, the single has to be the diameter of *one* of the original tips. If the single is bigger, even if it's smaller than the combined area of the two tips, it's noncompliant.
ie stock you have dual 2" tips, total area = 6.28sq". Swap to a single 2.5" tip, total area = 4.91sq" (smaller) and it's illegal.
__________________ 1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed] Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF. | Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z | Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry: |
Last edited by underscore; 10-18-2018 at 03:52 PM.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 04:13 PM
|
#488 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: 3rdrckfrmthesn
Posts: 3,701
Thanked 3,899 Times in 1,380 Posts
Failed 42 Times in 24 Posts
|
The law isn't the issue lately, it's the people in charge of enforcing it. VI's have been around long before most of us even drove a car but since the VPD and other units have their hackles up for whatever reason, dukkake(fucking great user name) or not, they are the ones choosing to be so strict. Trying to get them to back off by using a lawyer would be useless.
It's like speeding. The limit posted is 50kph. Everyone cruises by at 60kph average, no cop pulls anyone over. A random car blows by at 72kph, he's getting tagged. Now that guy blows up on social media calling cops out and doing childish things to try to get revenge (or whatever). Now cops are ticketing everyone going over 50kph. People are flipping out crying blue murder that they got a ticket for speeding when they were only going 54kph. Try fighting it. The law states that the limit is 50kph and you got caught doing 54kph. Pretty black and white. And only a lenient judge would grant any sort of sympathy in court.
|
| | This post thanked by: | Akinari, Allanc, AzNightmare, Badhobz, coneZONE, Energy, gilly, Indy, Jobo, mb_, R. Mutt, SkunkWorks, ThatKoukiKid, tofu1413, TouringTeg, Traum, underscore, vitaminG |
10-18-2018, 04:20 PM
|
#489 | I help report spam so I got this! <--
Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,867
Thanked 1,215 Times in 535 Posts
Failed 275 Times in 114 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by white rocket It's like speeding. | Don't give buddy any idea.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 04:22 PM
|
#490 | #savethemanuals
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,980
Thanked 2,551 Times in 950 Posts
Failed 106 Times in 40 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by white rocket The law isn't the issue lately, it's the people in charge of enforcing it. VI's have been around long before most of us even drove a car but since the VPD and other units have their hackles up for whatever reason, dukkake(fucking great user name) or not, they are the ones choosing to be so strict. Trying to get them to back off by using a lawyer would be useless.
It's like speeding. The limit posted is 50kph. Everyone cruises by at 60kph average, no cop pulls anyone over. A random car blows by at 72kph, he's getting tagged. Now that guy blows up on social media calling cops out and doing childish things to try to get revenge (or whatever). Now cops are ticketing everyone going over 50kph. People are flipping out crying blue murder that they got a ticket for speeding when they were only going 54kph. Try fighting it. The law states that the limit is 50kph and you got caught doing 54kph. Pretty black and white. And only a lenient judge would grant any sort of sympathy in court. | This. The speeding example is a good analogy. A VI is something squarely within an officer's discretion. Whether or not they choose to exercise that discretion is entirely up to the officer. They aren't doing anything wrong or exceeding their authority by issuing a VI.
Now there may be reasons not to go on an all out VI spree like maintaining a good relationship with the car community or keeping the image of being nice, etc but again that is up to the officer.
Maybe if whoever started this apologizes to the satisfaction of the officer then they will exercise their discretion and only give VIs to the extremely modified cars instead of the lightly modded or OEM+ ones.
Last edited by Energy; 10-18-2018 at 04:28 PM.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 04:33 PM
|
#491 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Jul 2017 Location: New Chinatown
Posts: 867
Thanked 589 Times in 246 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by white rocket The law isn't the issue lately, it's the people in charge of enforcing it. VI's have been around long before most of us even drove a car but since the VPD and other units have their hackles up for whatever reason, dukkake(fucking great user name) or not, they are the ones choosing to be so strict. Trying to get them to back off by using a lawyer would be useless.
It's like speeding. The limit posted is 50kph. Everyone cruises by at 60kph average, no cop pulls anyone over. A random car blows by at 72kph, he's getting tagged. Now that guy blows up on social media calling cops out and doing childish things to try to get revenge (or whatever). Now cops are ticketing everyone going over 50kph. People are flipping out crying blue murder that they got a ticket for speeding when they were only going 54kph. Try fighting it. The law states that the limit is 50kph and you got caught doing 54kph. Pretty black and white. And only a lenient judge would grant any sort of sympathy in court. | One problem with this analogy is that some people are getting VI'd with a completely stock car.
This is like being pulled over for going 49 km/h in a 50 km/h zone, which is complete BS. It's a waste of time and public resources.
It seems like now it's affecting non-car people's lives and that's when this really needs to just fucking stop.
Regarding the kid, whatever his name is, I don't give a dead moose's last shit about "the true story." Write an apology, give it to the cops, make it up to them so this shit stops before it can spread.
I don't know or care who is right or wrong. I just know this drama started because of the kid, so he will be the one to solve this hot mess.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 04:42 PM
|
#492 | "Entertainment" mod.
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 5,117
Thanked 3,432 Times in 1,051 Posts
Failed 161 Times in 60 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by UnknownJinX One problem with this analogy is that some people are getting VI'd with a completely stock car.
This is like being pulled over for going 49 km/h in a 50 km/h zone, which is complete BS. It's a waste of time and public resources.
It seems like now it's affecting non-car people's lives and that's when this really needs to just fucking stop.
Regarding the kid, whatever his name is, I don't give a dead moose's last shit about "the true story." Write an apology, give it to the cops, make it up to them so this shit stops before it can spread.
I don't know or care who is right or wrong. I just know this drama started because of the kid, so he will be the one to solve this hot mess. | "But but, don't believe everything you see on the Internet! REEEEEEEE!"
Now that I'm finding out that cars that would hardly pass as modified are being tagged, NOW is the time to just swallow your pride and straight up apologize. At this point it doesn't even matter if it was him, everyone thinks it is, and trying to straighten the story now isn't going to stop the VI's anytime soon.
I thought Ocean City PD during the idiocy formerly known as H2O was bad. Now it's getting to the point where non car people are likely to get caught up for factory negative camber. Speaking of, wouldn't having zero camber when factory recommends it be grounds to create dangerous cars because now they're unstable and out of factory specification?
__________________
Borokusowagen.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 04:52 PM
|
#493 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: revscene
Posts: 4,344
Thanked 4,863 Times in 1,664 Posts
Failed 165 Times in 63 Posts
|
When I first bought my BMW and saw other BMWs of the same gen on the road, I was curious as to why all these normal people with normal cars were #stancenation either that or just broken. Turns out that BMWs have a lot of factory camber.
I actually recently got aligned at TSS, who told me they can't do anything aside from factory alignment because of the restrictive factory tolerances.
But yes, it would be dangerous to have zero camber, which is out of factory specs. Ironic.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 05:42 PM
|
#494 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 3,012
Thanked 1,690 Times in 588 Posts
Failed 50 Times in 22 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher So does number 4 mean even the tips can not be larger than stock? Or the piping itself can not be?
4 would basically mean that the exhaust is in fact, basically unable to be modified if its the former. | Language is not clear but I remember we discussed this a few years ago agreed that a "cone shape" tip would be the best definition of widened and it wasn't meant to be restricting your diameter of exhaust to stock.
If you wanted to argue it, I would say a muffler with an inlet diameter equal to the outlet diameter should pass based on the current language.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 05:48 PM
|
#495 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 3,012
Thanked 1,690 Times in 588 Posts
Failed 50 Times in 22 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by CorneringArtist "But but, don't believe everything you see on the Internet! REEEEEEEE!"
Now that I'm finding out that cars that would hardly pass as modified are being tagged, NOW is the time to just swallow your pride and straight up apologize. At this point it doesn't even matter if it was him, everyone thinks it is, and trying to straighten the story now isn't going to stop the VI's anytime soon.
| Apologize? If you think one apology from one guy is going to stop all this I think you're wrong. This is no longer about that.
If they're pulling over regular Joes with almost stock cars, many of whom have no connection to the car modding community and probably have no idea who Dukkake is, then it is no longer about getting an apology from anyone. This is about them being assholes for the hell of it and costing us hundreds of dollars in unwarranted inspection fees because they can. They have the power to abuse this loophole and I'm sure they feel amazing for it.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 06:07 PM
|
#496 | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 118
Thanked 105 Times in 33 Posts
Failed 18 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by snowball Apologize? If you think one apology from one guy is going to stop all this I think you're wrong. This is no longer about that.
If they're pulling over regular Joes with almost stock cars, many of whom have no connection to the car modding community and probably have no idea who Dukkake is, then it is no longer about getting an apology from anyone. This is about them being assholes for the hell of it and costing us hundreds of dollars in unwarranted inspection fees because they can. They have the power to abuse this loophole and I'm sure they feel amazing for it. | Correct. I think people think the revenge thing is somehow justifies one side. Let's say if x kills wife of y, and y kills wife of x - both of them goes to jail. Crime of one person, is not an excuse for the crime of another. More over there is a group punishment because of one, and we are not in army or north korea(when the whole family goes in a gulag). In civilised country it is a big no no.
Last edited by nexusxv; 10-18-2018 at 06:12 PM.
|
| |
10-18-2018, 06:24 PM
|
#497 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,771
Thanked 582 Times in 173 Posts
Failed 54 Times in 23 Posts
|
when was last time cops have this major strict VI operation ? 2001 ?
And how long did it last ?
|
| |
10-18-2018, 06:31 PM
|
#498 | Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,756
Thanked 32,637 Times in 7,615 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 162 Posts
|
I just got a box one for illegal ride height
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5 Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever Westopher is correct. | Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82 seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked | Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct. | |
| | This post thanked by: | 320icar, Akinari, Badhobz, Bender Unit, BIC_BAWS, CL typeS, coneZONE, CorneringArtist, dark0821, Fafine, fivetwo, gilly, ime2006, J-Chow, Jmac, Lancouver, lgman, Nlkko, OGCStrike, richardmozis, RonaldTypeR, snowball, SpeedStars, ThatKoukiKid, The Producer, TouringTeg, Traum, white rocket, Zedbra |
10-18-2018, 06:31 PM
|
#499 | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,074
Thanked 3,186 Times in 929 Posts
Failed 296 Times in 68 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ime2006 when was last time cops have this major strict VI operation ? 2001 ?
And how long did it last ? | Don't know how long it lasted but this VI operation currently seems like it's been going on for almost 2 months now
|
| |
10-18-2018, 06:34 PM
|
#500 | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 475
Thanked 433 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 9 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher I just got a box one for illegal ride height | Holy fuckkkkk |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 PM. |