![]() |
Quote:
|
So it looks like questioning the number of migrants the country takes in is too controversial a subject and won't be tolerated in the current year https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...nier-1.5259538 Quote:
|
Quote:
https://scontent.fyvr4-1.fna.fbcdn.n...b5&oe=5DD521EC |
I dunno who within the People's Party approved that ad -- I dunno what their original intention might be, but the presentation totally came out wrong. What the heck does Bernier / People's Party mean by "no to mass immigration" anyway? Canada is a country built on immigration, and will continue to be a country that relies on immigration to keep the country going. So why is Bernier / People's Party against immigration? |
Quote:
https://www.nationalobserver.com/201...ion-billboards |
Quote:
Maybe a discussion on sustainable immigration is warranted |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Canada needs immigration to survive, especially as the baby boomers enter retirement and many millennials/post-millennials aren’t able to afford to have families. Controlled immigration is a given. You wouldn’t want to double the population in a decade as infrastructure, economy, etc simply wouldn’t support it and you’d have absolute chaos. But I don’t think any party is proposing that? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
67% of Canadians polled don't believe so. So why is it even "controversial" to question? If you believe more immigration is needed, fine. You vote for that. But it shouldn't be a controversial discussion to have. It's not an immoral thing to be weary of. |
Quote:
A good many people are all for immigration of people who go through the proper channels, are educated/skilled and of immediate use in Canada, and who wish to participate and endorse Canadian ideals and laws. |
Is he high? LMFAO Also, interestingly, sounds like there's not much news about the upcoming election. Previously, there were breakdowns of the different platforms. I can't seem to find those for the upcoming election. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
No one is implying that immigration isn't needed (though it is debatable whether lowering population equals lower gdp per capita). Some quick math: In order to sustain the population figures you need a birthrate of 2.1. We're at 1.6. The average annual number of deaths in Canada is between 250-300,000. We'll go the high end and say 3. 300,000 x .5 = 150,000. Oddly enough,the exact immigration figures that Bernier is proposing. So I'd say 150 would be a sustainable number. |
Here's some billboards no one will complain about Kappa https://www.narcity.com/u/2019/08/28..._1200x630.jpeg https://postmediatorontosun.files.wo...billboards.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...psd6wp21wb.jpg |
Quote:
https://nationalpost.com/news/politi...eau-government Ontario watch is actually the The Canada Growth Council. Why the 2 names? What are they hiding? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EADdsG1U4AA9IrT.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EADdytrU0AA27Aw.jpg |
Increased immigration presents real problems for everyone. Including those that immigrate here. https://vancouversun.com/opinion/col...al-report-says Quote:
|
Quote:
Just kidding I don’t wonder that because I understand the absolute lower level basics of human existence. |
conservatives bashing liberals for poor treatment of women? :awwyeah: |
Quote:
https://vancouversun.com/opinion/col...after-25-years Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net