![]() |
Quote:
Edit: if I read the posts following yours I could have ignored this post Completely. Lol |
Quote:
|
Can we stay on topic? This topic of tenderloins and ribs is making me hungry. |
Quote:
https://archive.org/details/CanadaAP...1540To1670.mkv Episode 2 and 3. It happened that the explorers and settlers were Catholics and Protestants. The reason for colonisation/settlement was not to spread religion. I agree that back in the day, 1600s to 1800s, religion had much more impact in the daily lives, since it was what most people were raised on. Furthermore, there was no evidence to disprove sarcred texts. edit: damn, ran across the 2015 election thread on RS. 34 pages in 3 months. This thread, 35 pages in one year. Where the hell did everyone go? https://www.revscene.net/forums/7046...ns-2015-a.html Also, a mod should setup a poll or new thread! |
The first permanent settlement in Canada (now Quebec) was formed by the jesuits missionaries in early 1600's. Brought by Samuel de Champlain under order of the kingdom of France to convert the pagan aboriginals. Jesuits were also sent to South and central Americas to convert the millions of aboriginals who inhabited the continent. This was done to counter the growing number of protestant followers, during the period leading to the thirty years war (1618-1648 i believe) which involved all countries of Europe between these two factions of Christianity. Millions dead. Yada yada yada. No doubt material gain was a big factor in the establishment of colonies. But it can't be overstated the initial goal of the French to grow the Catholic church during the period of that holy war. Ps. I haven't watched those videos yet tho. They are loooong dude. But I'm gonna watch them tonight as i do love good Canadian history docs. And i do appreciate you sharing |
Offtopic, more about Canadian history. Spoiler! |
anyone know if the french debate will be air'ed in english on TV? if so which channel? |
Quote:
I'll watch more of it tonight, maybe not so late haha. Some info: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesu..._North_America I found this series a few years back. It's got that good old Canadian feel to it. Like you're back in high school social studies. they're only about half hour too. Check it out. I think you'll like them. Here's an episode detailing the dynamics of what i was talking about |
If Scheer wants to win this, he has to pump Jagmeet Singh's tires, split the left vote because Cons is really only right (politically speaking) alternative. There are enough people who are sick and tired of Trudeau's privileged white arse but will never vote for Scheer. |
https://www.facebook.com/RichmondCha...5072779574206/ Don't think I saw this posted so I'll leave this here. Liberal/NDP candidate for Richmond Centre didn't even bother to show up. NDP candidate for Richmond East was too young and seemed a bit ill prepared. Joe Peschisolido and Alice Wong both felt like career politicians and Joe felt a lit greasy imo. |
Quote:
Is scheer still considered old stock? I also wonder who has been here longer Jagmeets dad or scheers? |
JT was getting very giddy when Bernier started the PPC, they thought it would split the right vote but so far, PPC is kinda irrelevant. Scheer is considered as exciting and has as much charisma as a piece of cardboard. But then again, maybe that's what you want in a PM instead of a party loving, over the top costume, hands roaming. selfie/IG star. |
https://vancouversun.com/news/politi...c-green-leader Quote:
|
|
Anyone else watching/listening to the debates on right now? |
Quote:
Have Scheer and Trudeau actually answered a question? Seems like they’re just regurgitating their pre-defined talking points on every topic. |
Quote:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-buffalo-chronicle/ Quote:
Quote:
What facebook group did you get this from? |
Quote:
Edit: except of course by typical response by Manic! |
May killed it. Trudeau was Trudeau. Scheer shit the bed - he was thrown nothing but softballs and instead of sending them deep he focused on attacking Trudeau. What a missed opportunity. Singh did well - he's the new cooler, hip Trudeau Max was Madmax - he's aware May will garner enough seats to basically render PR and nothing getting done, and he's pissed about it. Bloc was best dressed. typical quick debate with no real explanation of platforms. |
Quote:
|
May killed it? After her patronizing indigenous land acknowledgement to open her debate? Killed her chances more like it. |
Quote:
this was a general debate for the casuals. she killed it. |
Quote:
|
I think Jagmeet's stock rose, he presented himself as the most sincere and personal. He handled himself well. He had the best one line zingers. "You don't have to choose between Mr. Delay or Mr. Deny ... there is a better choice". To be expected, Trudeau was the punching bag all night. Scheer's opening volley was funny ... blackface, mask of feminism, mask of indigenous, mask of environmentalist. Trudeau ... blah blah blah ... Doug Ford ... blah blah blah ... Doug Ford Format was terrible with 5 moderators. If they were all men, people would scream bloody hell. We couldn't find one competent male moderator? As a whole, moderators were terrible, especially the 3rd one from the Toronto Star. |
These debates are so dumb. They don't have any substance, it's just a bunch of children yelling at each other. I really wish there was a better forum to help Canadians decide on who to vote for. These things are just silly. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net