Skinnypupp, you are are a complete fuking dipshit. China deserves you.....I guess you just got a few extra social credits...

^that WAS the stupidest shit I ever read from Skinnydawg. I almost thought his acct was hacked.

Dude, you need to get some rest and sleep. This is affecting your mental health.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/11...x2-700x467.jpg

nice meth lab guys

try not to blow off your arms

Pretty sure that’s a Lam-bro.
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/13...f?v=1542393503

Let me get this straight.

Since I said I did NOT judge someone for the socioeconomic platform they identify with, that means I said something SO BAD that I am suddenly a China shill, or my account was "hacked" or I am having a mental breakdown.

Again:

https://i.imgur.com/0yFlZUZ.gif

So I'll say it again: I don't have anything against communists. I don't agree with it, but I don't have a problem with it. I certainly take issue with some people who are (or were) communist, but the economic platform itself is not really the issue.

I also don't have a problem with capitalists either. Or socialists. Or christians, muslims, white, black, chinese, straight, gay, trans, chinese, canadian, filipino... basically ANYONE.

If it's not acceptable to you to NOT have prejudice against people who believe in communism... Sorry no, you're the one having a mental breakdown, not me. Are we living in 1954 again? Fucking god dammit... If I ever have a mental breakdown it's because I have to think about this shit here on fucking revscene. WutFace

^ ... no no no .. this stupid shit!

Edit - c'mon little dawg ... you're telling me this wasn't written when you were a bit tipsy on something or high on some Chinese mushrooms?

have a look at all surviving communist states

can usually find good examples of tightly-controlled media or a twisted judiciary system or both

somebody's gotta keep the peasants in line

True, but the economic theory itself doesn't make for that. It can be debated with pros and cons compared to capitalism

It's authoritarianism you have an issue with, not communism itself. And authoritarianism can be used along with communism (like in North Korea) or capitalism (like in China (kinda)). Likewise, democratic states can utilize different types of economic ideologies.

Remember this dude, allegation on kidnapped by China, tortured in custody.
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3f...g.png?w968h681

3 key points: 1) "held" by China 2) tortured 3) accused of soliciting "services / sex / massages"

BBC finally did the story and some truth came out.
I can't say he got kidnapped, I would say yes he got detained. Did he get tortured.... i would have to say eyahhh he most likely did. Was it over exaggerated, of course.. you gotta play that victim card to the max.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/11...4349837029.jpg
video of him going in and out of this "resort" 2/3 times and into a room for service.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/11...4349836977.jpg
this was his confession video; of course he's all calm now ahahhaha probably cause he got beat up and tortured.

Glad this came to an end, to date, he has not omitted to the "crime" in front of BBC. "I didn't do anything to hurt my loved one; I don't want to answer this allegation cause that's exactly what China wants you to focus on."
Well played, quick learner from Clinton ahahah

Still waiting for that explanation.

Or will it be the usual: mash fail button/ignore/label troll/fascist/whatever buzzword so many here who've disagreed with you have come to know?

If you can't understand the concept of an analogy, you are beyond help and not worth responding to anymore... Not in this thread at least.

All I can do is try to help people understand what's going on. If they don't understand it (doubtful since I made it as simple as possible, and I try to no longer assume stupidity) or refuse to understand it (more likely, due to the nature of certain peoples' other posts) then there's nothing more for me to say.

All I can do is try *shrug*

Some will get it, some never will. In the latter case, there's no reason to respond. Just fail the bad posts, ignore the innocuous posts, and move on, debating and chatting with the more intelligent/open minded people so we can learn from each other.

:awwyeah:
You think you're open minded? Your only recourse to those you've disagreed with has been to dismiss, label and hit fail. It's actually comical that you even think that.

Sorry, but one individual sovereign country invading another individual sovereign country is nothing like what's going on there.
In fact there's probably no accurate comparison you could draw in the world because no other individual country (that I'm aware of at least) has employed this cockamamie principal of one country two systems.

Here's an analogy for you; your comparison is like apples to airplanes.

I've posted some video of police beating people in front of cameras, but what they do at the station is much worse.

Translation from reddit:

An analogy is to help people overcome their preconceived notions (which are NOT wrong to have) in order to help them view things from another perspective.

An analogy is not meant to mirror the analog 1:1 precisely. It only needs to get an idea across, giving people a perspective they might not otherwise have when considering that idea.

What you are thinking of, is a comparison. We are not comparing the unconstitutional takeover of Hong Kong to a hypothetical takeover of Canada (because wtf would be the point of comparing reality to hyoptheticals?). We are using an analogy to give you, a non Hong Konger and someone who isn't familiar with the details, the view of what it would be like to be in the situation of an unconstitutional takeover. There is no exact 1:1 scenario in Canada where a country would break their constitution by taking them over, so the only feasible alternative is a hypothetical hostile takeover.

I actually am surprised I had to write that. I mean I would be if I didn't know your actual intentions. But there it is. I had good faith in my posts, and that's the best I can do. I feel confident I can leave it at that, and be correct. If you refuse, that's fine. Just don't be so surprised when people decide to dismiss you LUL

No, an analogy is a comparison of two completely different subjects to draw familiarity.
China is to Hong Kong what a fox is to It's pup. That's an analogy.
You compared one country to another. That's a comparison. and a poor one at that.
You just have too big an ego to admit your fault so you double down and hit fail every post.

Humility is to man what rain is to a flower. Analogies are fun, aren't they?

I tried. Oh well.

I think China is more like the chinese mother who sold their kid to a foster home and now wants them back now that their economic situation is better.

To understand littledawg, watch the Joey Siu video linked above a page or two ago.

Fail history much ?

It’s more like her kid was forcibly taken and now she finally has him back but he’s turned into a little shit who thinks he’s better than her.

Well. Aren’t they? :troll:

not since the 2000's hahahha :awwyeah:
https://media1.tenor.com/images/beb2...itemid=5621740

We Bare Bears!! That show is dope.

Which is why we have mainlanders piling up to get over the border am i right? The kool-aid tastes so good.

These guys got bail set at 5000hkd per person.

The couple that doused the old guy and set him on fire.

Bailed for 895hkd….