REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   coronavirus discussion (https://www.revscene.net/forums/716747-coronavirus-discussion.html)

Manic! 04-05-2020 03:24 PM

If you are a landlord and bought a property 10 plus years ago you will be in a good position. The rent you are able to charge has doubled and so has the value of the building. Even if your rental income drops by 30%/40% you should still be fine. Also anyone on goverment assistance will have no problem paying rent.

ilovebacon 04-05-2020 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manic! (Post 8981550)
If you are a landlord and bought a property 10 plus years ago you will be in a good position. The rent you are able to charge has doubled and so has the value of the building. Even if your rental income drops by 30%/40% you should still be fine. Also anyone on goverment assistance will have no problem paying rent.

I hope so, I am concern about my parent's mortgage even though I don't have one on my own yet.

SkinnyPupp 04-05-2020 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spoon.ek9 (Post 8981522)
This is actually why it was incredibly irresponsible for Trump to give false hope about the efficacy of the drug as a treatment/cure. Being in pharmacy, I can tell you that when he made that statement, it was at best anecdotal information being passed along to the American public as fact straight out of Trump's mouth on TV.

The average person does not have a good understanding of medications. Having talked to hundreds and hundreds of patients over the years, some people literally have no clue what it is they take and why. So when someone as important as the POTUS says on TV that this drug looks very promising, the average person can easily make the mistake (by similar names) that they have it in their household and it's the same thing. There was clearly also confusion that the couple thought it work as a preventative measure to stop themselves from being infected.

There's a ton of work that goes into making medications as fool proof as possible. The only onus on the patient is to read the instructions and take as directed; which, in itself, is hard enough as is for some people. By bypassing actual studies and waiting for verification of efficacy, the dangers of misuse/misinterpretation is extremely high. At this very moment, drug trials are being conducted in live time as we need to find something to treat this virus. Drug re-purposing is the only immediate option to hopefully combat this until a vaccine is created.

All of the above info is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to using medicine. This is part of the reason why it takes so long to get your retail prescriptions. They are taking the time to absolutely make sure you are getting what you're supposed to as well as how you're supposed to use it. Please treat your retail pharmacy staff with respect and patience. That's my PSA for the day.

For far too long, a lot of people have been treating their pharmacies like McD's.

I agree, but I will say that it's not really just hearsay that chloroquine could treat C19. There was a small study (in vitro) done in France that was done after the word from China came out as a potential treatment.

Most seem to skeptical of its potential as a treatment due to the size of the study, and it's definitely a terrible thing for a president to even bring it up as a treatment, but it's not exactly a rumor going around. There is SOME evidence that it could work. FWIW

spoon.ek9 04-05-2020 04:28 PM

yes, which is why it's categorized as anecdotal evidence. the only option is to try different treatments and see what works. if it works, fantastic. if it doesn't, other combinations are being tried. this is all in the name of trying to save those patient's lives and hopefully come up with something that can help others as well.

SkinnyPupp 04-05-2020 04:42 PM

OK maybe anecdotal evidence means something else in pharmaceuticals, I stand corrected

Edit: Just today a small in vivo study, also in France, came out saying that it wasn't effective

SkinnyPupp 04-05-2020 04:58 PM


Remember what I said 2 months ago about listening to TV Doctors :rukidding:

spoon.ek9 04-05-2020 05:12 PM

the most recent example would be the concern raised about the use of NSAIDs (ibuprofen etc) in treating the symptoms of covid-19. it was quickly dismissed because there was no real evidence to support it, just what people were saying in limited examples. I forget which country this was (france? italy?). anyways, they put that information out there with good intentions as a *potential* warning that it may worsen things.

results of this? people panicked and spread the info everywhere which later led to that official statement from WHO that it wasn't true. some people even misunderstood thinking that somehow taking an NSAID would make you vulnerable to contracting the virus.

summary:
1. info was anecdotal (even if best of intentions)
2. caused panic
3. misinformation spread
4. misinterpretation of already incorrect information
5. debunked with official statement

This is the danger of putting information out there too soon and also the danger of giving this type of information to the public. In a healthcare setting, it's meant to try and help each other treat patients. Again, we're looking at and trying everything available in a quick-moving situation.

Bouncing Bettys 04-05-2020 05:25 PM


Big brained media. Maybe Trump should have explicitly instructed people to drink fish tank cleaner in order to spare them from slowly starving to death.

Teriyaki 04-05-2020 05:32 PM

Surprised the big guy didn't give him a rhetorical answer to that actually retarded question

Hondaracer 04-05-2020 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manic! (Post 8981534)
You have to be pretty stupid not to pay your rent if you have the money. Your landlord may not be able to kick you out now but sooner or later he will sent your ass to the curb.

I got into an argument (imagine that? :p) on Facebook with Somone essentially telling people to tell their landlords to fuck off and not pay their rent

I explained that our portion of our house is almost exclusively powered by natural gas (central air furnace, gas range, LED lighting, gas powered hot water etc) with the suite powered almost exclusively by hydro (wall heaters, electric range, etc)

So basically the suite is almost entirely contained within itself for power and it frequently reaches $700 for every 2 months, almost entirely the suite

So as a landlord I’m suppose to eat the complete use of the suite? Like besides providing a roof over your head etc. I’m suppose to eat your use of electricity etc?

We are in a fairly fortunate situation and as I said before I’ve cut out Tenants rate in half for the foreseeable future however, as you said, if my tenant can’t pay rent after a couple weeks of no income, or a single income, you’re going to be gone shortly after once all this is over because you’ve proven to be unreliable.

Jmac 04-05-2020 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1337 (Post 8981530)
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1...922/MAAoqj.jpg

I'm not a landlord but do have a mortgage and my work has been impacted by the virus and will not be receiving any benefits as I will have minimal income coming in. I think tenants need to be working with their landlords and NOT against them in times where everyone is impacted. Banks can only defer mortgage payments in the most extreme of cases like getting laid off or at home sick with the virus and not earning income. The deferred payments will still need to be paid AND strata fees and other expenses will also need to be paid. My personal belief is that if you're a tenant and you're laid off or have no employment, allocate some of your CERB towards your rental payment (negotiate with your landlord what that might look like), but it's not the time to pool together to "show" landlords up. Many landlords like my mom does not profit from her rental income. A bit of a rant.

Agreed.

Also, this is Canada, it’s cheque like everywhere else in the world except our neighbours to the south, eh.

SkinnyPupp 04-05-2020 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spoon.ek9 (Post 8981577)
the most recent example would be the concern raised about the use of NSAIDs (ibuprofen etc) in treating the symptoms of covid-19. it was quickly dismissed because there was no real evidence to support it, just what people were saying in limited examples. I forget which country this was (france? italy?). anyways, they put that information out there with good intentions as a *potential* warning that it may worsen things.

results of this? people panicked and spread the info everywhere which later led to that official statement from WHO that it wasn't true. some people even misunderstood thinking that somehow taking an NSAID would make you vulnerable to contracting the virus.

summary:
1. info was anecdotal (even if best of intentions)
2. caused panic
3. misinformation spread
4. misinterpretation of already incorrect information
5. debunked with official statement

This is the danger of putting information out there too soon and also the danger of giving this type of information to the public. In a healthcare setting, it's meant to try and help each other treat patients. Again, we're looking at and trying everything available in a quick-moving situation.

That is definitely an example of anecdotal evidence being taken too seriously and spread as misinformation.

whitev70r 04-05-2020 06:02 PM

FYI

Coronavirus: Controversial malaria drug hydroxychloroquine tested at B.C. seniors’ home

https://globalnews.ca/news/6744766/h...e-coronavirus/

A controversial anti-malaria drug is being trialed as a therapy for COVID-19 at the B.C. seniors’ care home at the epicentre of the province’s novel coronavirus outbreak.

Global News has confirmed that residents of the Lynn Valley Care Centre are receiving hydroxychloroquine as a part of an international study on the effectiveness of the drug.

The drug is being administered to all residents of the virus-stricken building known as “the lodge” at the care home, with the exception of those who opted out of the trial.

Manic! 04-05-2020 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bouncing Bettys (Post 8981579)
https://twitter.com/JoeySalads/statu...64616980131841

Big brained media. Maybe Trump should have explicitly instructed people to drink fish tank cleaner in order to spare them from slowly starving to death.

The bottom bar proves my point. Trump: hydroxychloroquine may or may not work. Guess what eating dog shit may or may not work.

Also not letting people into grocery stores is not a 100% bad idea. they can have people order online or bring a list to the store and have staff get the food as they wait in there car. similar to what I am doing right now.

The_AK 04-05-2020 06:48 PM


ssjGoku69 04-05-2020 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 8981572)
https://twitter.com/KenTremendous/st...29069896835072

Remember what I said 2 months ago about listening to TV Doctors :rukidding:

I watched the video. One of the callers said "..and it's corona 19, that must mean there were at least 18 of these other ones" :seriously:

hud 91gt 04-05-2020 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jmac (Post 8981582)
Agreed.

Also, this is Canada, it’s cheque like everywhere else in the world except our neighbours to the south, eh.

That poster makes me so angry.

People see someone staying at home for work. Everyone else wants to stay at home and get paid their full salary. Some people get some benefits from the government to help the economy from imploding. Everyone then feels they should live for free because some people are getting benefits. For f^Cl$ sake. Why don’t we all not pay our mortgages/rent and none of us work? Are people seriously this stupid?

How about planning ahead for a rainy day and not blaming everyone else for your own issues? I could drive a fancy car, I could own a decent house, I could vacation all the time. But you know what? I don’t because I save for a god damn rainy day! Sure, I make a decent income and I realize some aren’t so fortunate. But when I made 32k a year, I was paying off student loans, living in $hit holes and having no life to do so. God damnit, people are so god damn entitled it pisses me off.

End of rant. I may join Happys team soon. Arrggh

Amuse 04-05-2020 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8981511)
THIS is what a LEADER for HIS people sounds like:

https://globalnews.ca/video/rd/ff41c...4/?jwsource=cl

So Canada will produce its own "N96" masks! From Woodbridge in Ontario, who specializes in manufacturing automotive supplies.
https://www.blogto.com/city/2020/04/n96-masks/

Medicom, of Quebec, "is aiming to open its first mask factory in Canada by July."

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...manufacturing/

welfare 04-05-2020 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amuse (Post 8981638)
So Canada will produce its own "N96" masks! From Woodbridge in Ontario, who specializes in manufacturing automotive supplies.
https://www.blogto.com/city/2020/04/n96-masks/

AHAHHAHAA!!!
N95<N96! Trump will not be pleased with that!!
It's perfect :lol

fishCak3s 04-05-2020 10:45 PM

Taiwan CDC/FDA demonstrate using a rice cooker to disinfect used face masks.

The original Mandarin version also talked about using UV rays (220-280nm wavelength in dish dryer's disinfection function) to disinfect used face masks. The UV rays would be useful for the top and bottom sides of the face mask; however, surgical face masks are 3 layers (6 sides in total) so the CDC/FDA can't be certain it would be effective for the rest of the 4 sides.


320icar 04-05-2020 11:01 PM

https://vancouver.craigslist.org/bnc...103802981.html

welfare 04-05-2020 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fishCak3s (Post 8981651)
Taiwan CDC/FDA demonstrate using a rice cooker to disinfect used face masks.

The original Mandarin version also talked about using UV rays (220-280nm wavelength in dish dryer's disinfection function) to disinfect used face masks. The UV rays would be useful for the top and bottom sides of the face mask; however, surgical face masks are 3 layers (6 sides in total) so the CDC/FDA can't be certain it would be effective for the rest of the 4 sides.

https://youtu.be/ogCTP3xCWkM

We're trying something similar with hockey equipment cleaning machine

https://globalnews.ca/news/6773148/r...-ppe-shortage/

GS8 04-05-2020 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manic! (Post 8981524)
https://www.theamericanconservative....4996902197.jpg

It says chloroquine right on the bottle.

There's also a picture of a fish and the words 'a new drug for treating fish disease'. Last I checked, we are currently not fish. Anyone who would consume from that bottle, I will personally mail a Darwin award to.

Some investigative journalism has been done since that story and it's showing that story to be quite 'fishy' but I don't expect the MSM to ever update this story again though as they are vultures, not storks.

Anyway, I'd rather the outrage shift back to malpractice that got us here.

https://i.imgur.com/Yvm1uPe.jpg

fishCak3s 04-06-2020 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 8981654)
We're trying something similar with hockey equipment cleaning machine

https://globalnews.ca/news/6773148/r...-ppe-shortage/

Not sure about the low temperature setting at 70c (TW FDA/CDC video suggested reaching and maintaining 110c) and the shortfall of using directional UV rays, but yes it's the same concept :bigthumb:.

SkinnyPupp 04-06-2020 12:17 AM

Ivermectin stops SARS-CoV-2 virus growing in cell culture

Not to get hopes up, but new info. This study killed 99.8 of the virus DNA within 48 hours, but it's important to note that this is In Vitro. Like Chloroquine, it might look good in a test tube, but prove to be ineffective in practice.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net