You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
The front is way too boxy, especially from the front view. That looks horrendous.
I know the 350Z also had a boxy front, but it was much smaller, and the edges were more beveled so it didn't look quite as bad.
I'm a bit mixed on the overall exterior. It's definitely more conservative as opposed to something like the GR Supra which looks aggressive, but way too busy. It has a bit of that "modern muscle" vibe like what they did with some of the modern American "muscle" cars. It's actually quite clean..
__________________ __________________________________________________ Last edited by AzNightmare; Today at 10:09 AM
__________________ Victoria Car Assessments - Condition assessments (test drive, photos, deficiencies and summary). RS member references available. IG @touringteg
1998 Acura Integra Type R #0635
2017 Honda Civic Type R #01818
Is anyone here wondering why Nissan decided with make a niche sports car without partnering with someone else when they are bleeding to death in all segments outside Asia?
Officially announced, 400HP, 350ft-lb tq, 6 M/T. Interior is still typical of Nissan. Makeup on a pig - still a bunch of cheap hard plastic. Reminds me of why I passed up a 370Z nismo and got a 2002 E46 M3 instead.
__________________
|| 18 FK8 | R-18692 | Rallye Red | 6 MT ||
|| SOLD 97 E36 M3 Sedan | Arctic Silver | 5MT ||
|| RIP 02 E46 330ci | Schwartz Black II | 5MT | M-Tech II | Black Cube | Shadowline | Stoff Laser/Anthrazit ||
|| RIP 02 E46 M3 | Carbon Black | 6MT ||
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North vancouver
Posts: 12,771
Thanked 32,666 Times in 7,623 Posts
Failed 214 Times in 162 Posts
Looks fantastic. I hope it does well. If it doesn’t, no one will try anymore and there will be nothing cool for enthusiasts between the FR-S and the Cayman/m2
__________________
98 technoviolet M3/2/5
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever
Westopher is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fsy82
seems like you got a dick up your ass well..get that checked
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkwax
Well.. I’d hate to be the first to say it, but Westopher is correct.
The blue exterior is making it look a lot better than the yellow on the prototype car. But that same blue in the interior is totally ruining it for me.
I know 400hp is 400hp. But looking at that USD $40k starting price for the "base" model, I think the next higher trim -- Z Performance? -- is the model that "enthusiasts" would want. Stiffer suspension, LSD, and some sort of upgraded brakes. At that trim level, I'd be very surprised if it doesn't break the Cdn$50k mark -- actually, I'd expect that to get close to the Cdn mid $50k's.
(Also recall that here in BC, the PST part goes higher than 7% once the sale price is higher than $55k.
And then I'm gonna ask myself -- do I really want to spend $62k after tax on a Nissan? (For the record, I'd much rather spend $35 - $36k after tax on a GR86, power be damned.)
^^ I doubt it as the 350z sold tonnes because there was crazy financing offers by Nissan back then and we had the strong Cad so there were lots of US imports. You barely see any 370z and unless they have long and cheap financing deals they won't sell that many. I think they will run into the issue of the stinger GT, that by the time it came out it was too expensive and no one wanted to pay that much for a Kia / Nissan, isn't a Gtr like $140k when they were supposed to start at like $75