View Single Post
Old 12-18-2003, 09:26 AM   #3046
SmokeyTheBandit
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
SmokeyTheBandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: kelowna
Posts: 1,336
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally posted by Danch
Got the reply smokey.

It's designed to make less torque and have a much higher redline. the redline is probably somewhere in the 14,000 range like my bike. HP is just a measure of torque at RPM so the higher the RPM the more HP measured for a given torque.. The engine isn't any more powerful you can just get more out of it. My bike makes 101 HP but probably only makes 40 ft/lbs. On a car that would be undrivable, on a bike it's damn quick due to the weight difference.
exactly what i thought.


i was waiting to see if anyone knew that most superbikes (inline) make 50-90 ft/lbs.. the vtwins make more, but there redline is much lower due to the configuration of a V setup

a very short bore and stroke found on all superbikes attributes to the very high reving capabilities. i mean, with a long rod, its not feasable/safe to make a longer stroke engine run at the same RMP as one with a shorter one. the r6 redlines at 15,500 RPM and makes 133hp.. torque, i dont know., probably 55-60.

longer rods, found in muscle cars atribute to a greater torque force (leverage you could say?).

i was taught how to calculate HP from a torque reading.. but i forgot how to

to prove this theory you can look at 3 classes of bikes

600
750
1000

600 - 15,500 rpm, shortest stroke, least torque, 130hp
750 - 14,500 rpm, 2nd longest stroke, 2nd most torque, 150 hp
1000 - 13,000 rpm, longest stroke, most torque, 170 hp

thanks for the confirmation
SmokeyTheBandit is offline   Reply With Quote