View Single Post
Old 12-29-2005, 12:52 AM   #354
yameen
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
yameen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,365
Thanked 156 Times in 63 Posts
Failed 37 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Jmac
As was said, Megapixels are still important, but not the end-all-be-all spec of a camera.

You should first determine the size of pictures you want, then look at all the cameras within that megapixel range.

As a general guideline, you should look at the following Megapixel ranges (or higher) for these size pictures.

4"x6"
Minimum = 0.5 MP
Good = 1.3 MP

5"x7"
Minimum = 0.8 MP
Good = 2.0 MP

8"x10", 8"x11.5" or 8"x12"
Minimum = 2.0 MP
Good = 5.0 MP

10"x15"
Minimum = 3.1 MP
Good = 7.9 MP

12"x18"
Minimum = 4.4 MP
Good = 11.3 MP

16"x24"
Minimum = 7.9 MP
Good = 20.2 MP

So, basically, what this means is that if you're only going to make 4"x6" prints from it, a higher quality 2.0 MP camera will serve you better than a lower quality 4.0 MP camera. However, if you go up to 8"x10" prints, you would probably be better off with the 4.0 MP camera.
does this mean that i shouldn't even get at 5.0mp camera? i think i'm mostly going to develop pictures that are 5" x 7" or a bit bigger. if i were to take 5"x7" pictures with a 5.0mp camera, would it still turn out okay? if i were to go as far as 6.0mp, that's wrong right? from what i read, 7.0mp is out of the question. i'm a total newbie at this and any comments and insight would be great. thanks!
yameen is offline   Reply With Quote