REVscene Automotive Forum - View Single Post

dton13 · 05-21-2008, 09:14 PM

So I'm comparing getting either the used 17-85 IS or the used Sigma 18-200 non OS. I'm kind of on a tight budget, and the 17-200 seems to make more sense to me. Is there something I'm missing here? minus the IS

tia

05-21-2008, 09:14 PM	#287
dton13 RS controls my life! Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Burnaby Posts: 734 Thanked 135 Times in 51 Posts Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts	So I'm comparing getting either the used 17-85 IS or the used Sigma 18-200 non OS. I'm kind of on a tight budget, and the 17-200 seems to make more sense to me. Is there something I'm missing here? minus the IS tia Last edited by dton13; 05-21-2008 at 09:15 PM.