so if i receive an interest rate at prime, would that change your entire argument about being a bum? then it would simply a matter of borrowing money. going even more conservative, i could argue that NOBODY needs a student loan.
because anyone who can attend school should be able to save up $ to pay for school right?? anyone can get a job at mcdonalds, therefore, student loans aren't needed.
you seem to have a strong judgmental opinion on what constitutes as transportation. first it has to be a beater car, then it has to be the bus. what if i dont live on route? what is considered on route to you, is it exactly 300m from the nearest bus stop? what if i live 301m from the bus stop, would that 1m make it OK to use the $ for my car?
what consitutes as a beater car to you, does it have to be <$1000? what if its $1000.99?
what's the difference between insuring and maintaining both cars if insurance, maintenance, and fuel costs the same??
Quote:
Unless you're making more than $60K, you're a drain on the system. 50% of the taxes are paid by people making more than $60K. So if you were making less than $60K, you were paying less than the average amount of tax, and thus using more than you were paying for.
What you're exercising is typical leftist socialist bullshit, asking for those who pay the majority of taxes to subsidize your lifestyle, when you're perfectly capable of doing it yourself if you were willing to make a sacrifice.
|
so make poor/poorer peoples lives harder for richer people to benefit? that's exactly what we need, we need to separate the rich and poor even further apart. i'm not capable of generating enough income to maintain a moderate standard of living while taking full time classes, unless i sold a kidney. should i do that? it's an asset...