Thread: Question
View Single Post
Old 08-08-2009, 02:17 PM   #13
E=mc˛
I don't get it
 
E=mc˛'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 408
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by zulutango View Post
"186 Except when a peace officer directs otherwise, if there is a stop sign at an intersection, a driver of a vehicle must stop

(a) at the marked stop line, if any,

(b) before entering the marked crosswalk on the near side of the intersection, or

(c) when there is neither a marked crosswalk nor a stop line, before entering the intersection, at the point nearest the intersecting highway from which the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting highway. "

It's simple...IF she did this, the ticket is not valid...if she did NOT, then the ticket IS valid.
But this isn't a stop sign, it's a yield sign.
It's one of those right turns where, theres a little turn off on the right with a yield sign. This is NOT the same as facing a red light or stop sign.
This is where I'm confused, because I'm sure there's no requirement to stop behind the stop line (in fact, there IS NO stop line) if the latter condition "stopping if necessary" was in play.

SOMETIMES however, there are zebra crossings for pedestrians, but if there are no pedestrians theres no requirement to stop behind the crosswalk (you don't stop at pedestrian crosswalks if there are no pedestrians after all). Most people stop PAST the crosswalk near the merge point. How on earth can you get a rolling stop infraction for yield signs??
The only time you are required to stop before the crosswalk is when you're at a stop sign or red light.

I take back what I said in my last post. I don't see how this ticket can be valid.

Last edited by E=mc˛; 08-08-2009 at 02:27 PM.
E=mc˛ is offline   Reply With Quote