REVscene Automotive Forum - View Single Post - New HD

Ferra · 11-06-2009, 07:44 AM

I need a new HD and I have trouble deciding between whether I should get the seagate 7200.12 or WD Caviar Black.

Size wise I am looking at the 500GB model, and their prices are very similar. (WD black costs $4 more)

I am using it in an office machine, no gaming, but I want it to be very quick and responsive when it comes to opening applications and files.
Looking at the benchmark kinda makes it even harder coz it seems the seagate has better average read/write performance, but the WD black has better score in benchmark like PCmark.

Seagate drive is considerably smaller, consume less energy and runs cooler, so I think my main question is really, is the WD Black drive going to show a noticeable difference in speed (for things like opening folders/document/spreadsheet).
If the difference is negligible, I think I will go with the seagate just for its cooler and quieter running drive...
Anyone has experience with both or able to comment on their performances?

11-06-2009, 07:44 AM	#1
Ferra I don't like cheese but I love milk! Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Van Posts: 1,980 Thanked 895 Times in 243 Posts Failed 105 Times in 49 Posts	New HD - 7200.12 or Caviar Black I need a new HD and I have trouble deciding between whether I should get the seagate 7200.12 or WD Caviar Black. Size wise I am looking at the 500GB model, and their prices are very similar. (WD black costs $4 more) I am using it in an office machine, no gaming, but I want it to be very quick and responsive when it comes to opening applications and files. Looking at the benchmark kinda makes it even harder coz it seems the seagate has better average read/write performance, but the WD black has better score in benchmark like PCmark. Seagate drive is considerably smaller, consume less energy and runs cooler, so I think my main question is really, is the WD Black drive going to show a noticeable difference in speed (for things like opening folders/document/spreadsheet). If the difference is negligible, I think I will go with the seagate just for its cooler and quieter running drive... Anyone has experience with both or able to comment on their performances?