Quote:
Originally Posted by - kT
i reread the letter, and found something you guys might've overlooked
given that its 2010, and their partnership started in 2002, almost nine years would be almost 2011. if this letter had been delivered last year, than it would've been 7 years. nowhere close to 9 years
that, plus the fact that this was only recently posted on the guys blog lead me to believe that the "April 2009" part was the error in this letter
although i could have missed something entirely
|
Mmm the year thing is a bit confusing. But to respond to your other point, IMO this letter was posted because the situation was not resolved and that now it seems like AJ is pointing fingers at J's. Therefore J's decides since the issue with AJ was not resolved in a favourable manner to them, that they alert the public about what had been going on by posting the letter.