Quote:
Originally Posted by TOS'd
Mmm the year thing is a bit confusing. But to respond to your other point, IMO this letter was posted because the situation was not resolved and that now it seems like AJ is pointing fingers at J's. Therefore J's decides since the issue with AJ was not resolved in a favourable manner to them, that they alert the public about what had been going on by posting the letter.
|
possibly, but they have never directly said that AJ was directly responsible for doing this in the past (with the exception of the PDF document being labeled AJCANADA), so maybe now they're publically saying that it's them responsible
regardless, i think that clears up the matter of when the actual letter was posted - this year, and the deadline is likely april of 2010