REVscene Automotive Forum - View Single Post

bcedhk · 01-19-2010, 12:23 AM

i think FLAC is benificial for older music. I have a collection of Eric's Clapton in FLAC and i can def tell a difference in his live disc compare to 320.

I run a DAC , tube amp and headphones.. with FLAC the background noise and instrument sound more lively compare to 320... but again, everyone's hearing is different and subjective.

If it is for just regular playing outdoors, just use 320... if it is for @ home quiet listening time, I would run FLAC

01-19-2010, 12:23 AM	#8
bcedhk RS has made me the bitter person i am today! Join Date: May 2005 Location: 604 Posts: 4,571 Thanked 1,792 Times in 572 Posts Failed 335 Times in 77 Posts	i think FLAC is benificial for older music. I have a collection of Eric's Clapton in FLAC and i can def tell a difference in his live disc compare to 320. I run a DAC , tube amp and headphones.. with FLAC the background noise and instrument sound more lively compare to 320... but again, everyone's hearing is different and subjective. If it is for just regular playing outdoors, just use 320... if it is for @ home quiet listening time, I would run FLAC