Quote:
Originally Posted by RiceIntegraRS
Theres alot of talk around the league about who should win the Hart Trophy. Maybe its because im more interested in it since Sedin is in the race. But who do u guys think should win? Remember Hart Trophy means Most Valuable to its team, not Best player in the league(Obviously its Ovechkin i believe)
Anyways Henrik should win because without him, does Burrows, Daniel, and Sammuellson have there career years? He also proved critics wrong when they said he can only play with his brother. The only other canidates id be happy beating Henrik would be either Miller or Bryzgalov.
|
I can see an argument for any of Crosby, Ovechkin, Henrik or Miller winning it. I think it will probably go to Ovechkin because like they said on the radio earlier do you want to have the awards show and not have the face of your league and the best player in it not getting an award?
__________________
The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place... and I donīt care how tough you are, it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently, if you let it. You, me or nobody, is gonna hit as hard as life. But ain't about how hard you hit... It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward... how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Thatīs how winning is done. Now, if you know what you worth, go out and get what you worth. - Rocky Balboa
|