Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaru
Correct. And in the case of university professors, they are paid to conduct unbiased, scientifically-accurate research without the threat of commercial or political interference. There is no reason nor incentive for them to misrepresent the dangers of saturated fats. (If anything, I would think conspiracy theorists should be arguing that McDonald's, Kraft and other food companies are bribing scientists to argue that high-fat foods AREN'T harmful...)
I cited research from the world's most reputable and well-respected research universities and health organizations... yet you fail my posts and call me a moron, but don't explain why you think I'm wrong?
Whatever... I'm not too bothered by your insults or trolling, but people read this particular forum for health advice. Telling them that it's good to eat saturated fats when 95%+ of the world's nutrition and health experts disagree is misleading and irresponsible.
If you want to refute the claims I posted above, go for it. If not, then please don't insult me and please don't spread inaccurate information to the general public.
|
No,
you stop spreading inaccurate information to the general public.
And a lot of big corporations are the ones funding university studies in the states, so those professors are influenced and biased. A lot of results get suppressed because the big corporate sponsors do not like them. As well, the US government like to support certain industries; for example you should search "King Corn" and "Prescription for Disaster" videos.
Also check out
www.blogtalkradio.com/undergroundwellness
On another note, I think Taubes is coming up with a condensed version of Good Calories, Bad Calories