Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
C'mon guys, read the articles.... Lu's contract is safe for now. The Post, and all articles derived from the Post (i.e. Botchford in today's Province) are either spewing shit about things they obviously know nothing about or are wildly misinterpreting third-party information.
|
I don't think that was his point. I think what he meant was how this whole gong show started. None of the existing contracts are in violation of the CBA. The definition of circumvention isn't clearly defined in the CBA, so now we have this.