View Single Post
Old 11-12-2010, 10:40 PM   #897
ilvtofu
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,719
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever View Post
The Nikon 200-400 costs $6000+, but it's bloody amazing. The Canon 100-400 is way too slow for concert use. Do you really need FF for your work though? A crop body with good lowght capability like the 7D is probably best for you.
Posted via RS Mobile
Quote:
Originally Posted by m3thods View Post
i agree with senna that you need a 2.8 or faster. if budget is an issue the non-is version of the sigma 70-200 has some decent reviews, and with hsm it'll be more helpful than the tamron in low light.

gars is also right in that you get more return out of lenses compared to bodies, so if it's what you need now, it's not too difficult to move along as you can still get good dollar for your lens.

if you do this often, get what you need now and worry about the FF issue when/if it comes.
Good points I think I will get rid of my 17-40 and get the sigma with the OS, for that amount of zoom I think OS is a good idea
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote