View Single Post
Old 11-24-2010, 12:15 PM   #218
StylinRed
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,694
Thanked 10,397 Times in 3,920 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco911 View Post
I do not think that is a relevant section of law. The relevant section of Law is the BC Civil Forfeiture Act. Note that unfair laws are written all the time and are struck down and repealed if higher courts decide that they are unjust.
and if someone takes the case to the supreme court and the supreme court so decides the govt can enact the Notwithstanding Clause and continue seizing

you could argue that the law was applied incorrectly and win it that way (if so proven) but gl with that, paying a 20% fine for being an idiot is a lot less time consuming and the cheaper way out

Quote:
Attorney General New Brunswick
while the views of New Brunswick politicians are valued they are simply viewpoints (even the attorney generals); tell that to Ontario and their seizures of property under their Street Racing Laws, etc etc
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote