Quote:
Originally Posted by Anjew
for some reason i can see a lot of $0 dollar income and networth idiots causing a problem with this  |
A law where financial penalties are based on income would never pass if it did not account for this scenario, there would need to be a minimum penalty that escalates with the perpetrators income. A ticket could have an $80 minimum, with an additional 1% of net annual income added to that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco911
Look up search and seizure laws:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and Warrants shall not be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
|
I'm familiar with search and seizure laws, if you read the post above mine you will understand what I was responding to in my post. In a sarcastic way, I was saying the government has a right to seize property if its owner uses it to endanger others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco911
What's reported in the media is not necessarily what actually occurred.
|
I agree, but theres a grain of truth to every story even if it naturally grows each time it's retold. A media organization would not risk its credibility publishing a completely falsified story and the police have no incentive to falsify this one.