Quote:
Originally Posted by Noir
I didn't catch this post before edit but I got your PM and saw your FC thread. FYI, it wasn't about winning dude. It's all just about hockey.
This goes for other fans out there, not just you. There's a certain contingent of Canuck fans that think they do service by pimping their team's grandieur.
Yes, the above will earn nothing but "brownie points" from other non-hockey knowing Canuck fans but in hockey perspective IMO, it's doing the fanbase a huge disservice when the opinions I find pimped at times are so biased that it holds little to no actual merit.
Better to be called a bandwagoner but your opinions have some hockey merit because they actually reflect what's on the ice, rather than earn props as a blind-devotee but one who's opinions rarely reflect what occurs on ice.
With hockey talk, there's nothing I find more silly (and presses my buttons more which gets me into conflict a lot) than the rules that seem to govern Canucks discussion. The rules I found being Pro opinions = "good opinions" and Con opinions = "bad opinions".
And BTW, I thought I was igNOIRed?
|
haha, this chat isn't even remotely bad when you compare it to the forums on canucks.com