View Single Post
Old 03-10-2011, 02:55 PM   #23
TheNewGirl
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
 
TheNewGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 1,476
Thanked 522 Times in 263 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 40 Posts
Da Fonz.

The same journal contains articles supporting more frequent eatting.

http://journals.cambridge.org/downlo...bbfbf916a408e1

Shows slightly higher physical activity but more importantly, better fat oxidation in a three meal a day over two meal a day model and that the less frequent meals may promote fat storage.

The research on it is ALL over the place.

Ideally one would carry around a blood glucose monitor and test themselves frequently, basing their eatting on the results not what their stomach tells them (cause your stomach and mouth lie, as a I learned when I had to test around the clock for 48 hours recently, you're totally right, the feeling which most of us call having low blood sugar is really us being thirsty most of the time or bored). But people don't (though I totally recommend anyone who has access to one of these with a clean needle and a container of strips does it).

I have found, personally, that the best way to keep my blood glucose at ideal levels is to graze.

But different bodies do different things, which is one of the big confounding issues with the literature.

Re: Nuts. Fat is not bad. Calories are not the issue. Sugar is the issue. Nuts are full of good fats, and fiber. A handful (not a whole bag but a handful) of walnuts or almonds is a fantastic way to get fiber, protein, iron, calcium and fat into your diet. Check out the Fat Head documentry on the tread I mentioned above.
__________________
~ Just another noob looking for a clue

Last edited by TheNewGirl; 03-10-2011 at 03:02 PM.
TheNewGirl is offline   Reply With Quote