04-25-2011, 06:33 PM
|
#25942
|
|
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,457
Thanked 2,259 Times in 439 Posts
Failed 595 Times in 124 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp
How many times do I have to repeat this?
The Torres hit wasn't a penalty for the charging, blindside, or elbowing, or anyhting like that. It was interference.
If you are saying the Bickell hit was like the Torres hit, with the exception that Bieksa had the buck, then you should understand exactly why one was a penalty. One was for interference, one wasn't.
|
So are you saying that Bickell shouldn't have gotten a charging penalty?
|
|
|