Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp
How many times do I have to repeat this?
The Torres hit wasn't a penalty for the charging, blindside, or elbowing, or anyhting like that. It was interference.
If you are saying the Bickell hit was like the Torres hit, with the exception that Bieksa had the buck, then you should understand exactly why one was a penalty. One was for interference, one wasn't.
|
the torres hit was a cop out call for the refs not knowing how to fucking react to a hit that crippled seabrook. if you look the puck IS in the area, and interference is a lame call for a play like that.. it actually would have made more sense if they called it a charge... people actually wouldn't have complained as much if it were a charge (except canuck fans)