Quote:
Originally Posted by apple_cutie
I wish you a painful death.
Posted via RS Mobile |
We're talking about Usage Based Billing.
Some of us think it fucking sucks. The only thing that will prevent it is a change in the government so... add something to the conversation or STFU. Hey maybe some Conservative MP spoke up about this some where that we didn't hear about. That would be on topic with out threatening your devout right wing leanings.
And seriously. If you are so insecure in your politics that you have to threaten death on someone who disagrees with you maybe you should reexamine a few things. The fantastic thing about democracy is you're allowed to have your opinion, and I'm allowed to have mine.
Back to the issue at hand. I was under the impression that Telus doesn't really have a way to accurately measure traffic to the degree Shaw can. Also, how would they measure IP traffic for Optik users when their television is essentially coming over the internet as well, are they double dipping or do they have a way to differenciate traffic?
Looking at the article too some of the statements:
Quote:
|
"It's only fair that people pay for how much Internet capacity they use," Hall said.
|
Quote:
|
Anderson said a gigabyte of data costs between one and eight cents to deliver, but some companies have proposed charging between two and 10 dollars per gigabyte downloaded above a user's data limit.
|
And... how is that fair?