View Single Post
Old 05-27-2011, 04:06 PM   #14
Vangruver
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mt Pleasant
Posts: 1,514
Thanked 171 Times in 104 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ime2006 View Post
Just wondering

Spend same amount of time on both.
which is more efficient ??


Update:
I just wanna burn more FAT................I should just run longer and have heart rate at 160 avg right ???
You'll enjoy cycling more, as it also works your core more so than running will.

And if you combine the running with cycling, you'll notice improvements all around.

I can't run due to the shock on my joints, but i do walk a lot to supplement the different muscle groups used. And I walked with weights on my legs. No where near as effective but it helped a little bit.
__________________
don't bite styles, bite nipples cuz she's freaky

Vangruver is offline   Reply With Quote