REVscene Automotive Forum - View Single Post - 24 Hour Prohibition & Driving W/O Consideration

Simnut · 06-11-2011, 11:51 AM

Oh, I agree that this should be argued in the Supreme Court. And that is my goal.

You see, I'm confused as to why section 90.3 was legislated in the first place? Could it have been all the legal research done by the Govt and they realized that section 215 DOESN'T cover the novice driver? Why not just stay with the 24 hour then....my thinking is because it, in it's entirety, does not apply to the novice driver.

Shirley Bond, the Minister of the Solicitor General is looking into this now, and I am waiting for her staff to get back to me. I'm not out to get "impaired" drivers off, that's not my point. My point is using the MVA properly....as it was legislated to work.

If you answer the three questions of my previous post, can you see my point?

06-11-2011, 11:51 AM	#29
Simnut ...on a mission.... Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: n Posts: 281 Thanked 60 Times in 30 Posts Failed 15 Times in 14 Posts	Oh, I agree that this should be argued in the Supreme Court. And that is my goal. You see, I'm confused as to why section 90.3 was legislated in the first place? Could it have been all the legal research done by the Govt and they realized that section 215 DOESN'T cover the novice driver? Why not just stay with the 24 hour then....my thinking is because it, in it's entirety, does not apply to the novice driver. Shirley Bond, the Minister of the Solicitor General is looking into this now, and I am waiting for her staff to get back to me. I'm not out to get "impaired" drivers off, that's not my point. My point is using the MVA properly....as it was legislated to work. If you answer the three questions of my previous post, can you see my point?