08-21-2011, 02:02 AM
|
#274
|
|
Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,854
Thanked 4,387 Times in 1,145 Posts
Failed 514 Times in 158 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp
Interesting how this came to be
- first, HP buys Palm for $1.8bn (actually, $1.2bn and then some directly-related expenses bring it up to $1.8bn)
- then, HP makes approx $5.1bn in 'support' acquisitions (music services, video libraries, cloud services, etc.)
- then, HP spends $0.6bn with TV and print advertising for the Veer and TouchPad
- then, HP discovers that it's going to take another 'several hundred million dollars' {source: earnings call} to achieve tenable position in tablet market. Hmm, spend another $0.7bn to get value out of $7.5bn investment? Obvious solution: pull plug, burn bridges, walk away.
- at the same time, HP's CEO decides he wants HP to be more like SAP. Oh, did I mention that HP's current CEO is the former CEO of SAP? And that he was turfed from SAP for diminishing shareholder value?
- so, HP announces that it's going to buy a software company that sorts e-mails for $10.4bn - approx 35x earnings. Analysts estimate value of company at about $4bn
- the market responds by selling HP stock like it was bubonic plague. Drops 22.6% and still falling...
- Estimated value wiped out in 48 hours on stock alone: $13.9bn
- Estimated value lost in Palm acquisition (so far): $7.5bn
- Estimated value pissed away on 'Autonomy' purchase: $10.4bn
- Total amount of money wasted: $31.8bn
- Likely cost of inevitable shareholder lawsuits: unknown
- Value of lost reputation, lost opportunities, etc.... Priceless
|
Sorry I don't quite understand this point, can you elaborate on it?
__________________
GO Canucks GO!
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) hi there
(づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ・。*。✧・゜゜・。✧。*・゜゜・✧。・$$$$$゜゜・。*。・゜*✧ .
xxx~*…like dis post if u cry evry time…~*xxx
|
|
|