Quote:
Originally Posted by skippynixx
Games like these really make me wonder how AV is able to keep his job. Once theyre down by two he tends to try one or two strategies then pack it in and gives the excuse of "the work ethic wasn't there tonight, we'll have to put this one behind us, and get focused on the next game". Does AV have any idea on how to motivate his players? To me it seems like we have Hank, Dank, Kes, and Juice who are the ones that are coaching this team.
|
Didn't A.V bench Trevor Lindin?
Didn't A.V call other coaches from other sports to see how to 're-motivate' the team this season?
Does A.V call time outs when the play is one sided and the game could go downhill fast?
Didn't A.V mix all of his lines up a few years ago on 3-4 game losing skid and turn it into a 9 game losing streak, and only when a certain local famous singer said he shouldn't keep mixing up his lines and he stoped they won.
Didn't Matthew Schinder, Marcus Nausland, Matt Cooke, and countless others not get along with A.V?
Has A.V learned that when you roll 4 lines, the games are always close, and end up in a majority of wins?
After multiple seasons, has A.V not learned how to deal with Luongos fragile ego?
Does A.V ever stack a line of Sedin x 2, Kesler, Salo, Edler on a non power play to try and get some offence?
Has A.V learned that the best defence is a good offence?
Is A.V destined to make the same mistakes again in the playoffs (If we make it) against Chicago 4 years in a row? Like he didn't learn after the first one.
I don't care what anyone says, A.V is a huge problem. Look at the Penguins when they made it aand lost to the Wings. What major move did they make to win the cup the next year?
Coaching is huge in hockey.
We will not win a Stanley Cup with A.V as head coach.