Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp
So Daniel would have gotten more than one shot attempt? Because the puck went in?
The team played like shit. They have played like shit for this whole season. They have been shut out THREE TIMES. TWICE at home. All the "puck luck" in the world isn't going to help when your #1 d man is THE WORST MINUS PLAYER IN THE NHL and your goalie is playing like an ECHL reject, and your top scorer is getting ONE shot in a game.
There is a lot this team needs to fix. Scoring one goal against the Blues is not it.
|
Its called momentum. If kesler scored that goal it would of been a totally different game. Unless u forgot about how we dominated the NYR, if luongo stopped that first goal it would of been a totally different game aswell. Like any sport, a bad pass, a lucky punch, a good bounce can change everything regardless of how bad or good uve been playing
Im not denying the fact that the canucks are playing like shit and have alot of things to fix, but it seems like u dont believe that a lucky bounce can change the outcome of the game. In hockey scoring first is big. They call it "Game Changers" "Turning Points" "Play of the Game" for a reason
Posted via RS Mobile