Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar
so im a COD guy. the infinity ward games, specifically.
I bought into the hype and the marketing for BF3 pulling COD players over and bought it to give it a legit shot
and man, this game fucking sucks compared to COD4 and MW2. and even compared to black ops.
the campaign was complete bullshit. finished it nearly in just one sitting. and it was a pretty good knock off of black ops. there were some missions that definitely had potential, but they just fell short. the AI on the opposing players was non existent, they just simply follow their programmed pattern, and your buddies dont do shit either.
but multiplayer... BF3 guys always talk shit on COD for how its multiplayer is all noob and run and gun shit. its way fucking worse in BF3! the game speed seems faster too, like running is way faster, and i dont think that helps at all. maybe its better on PC, i dunno, but on XBOX its terrible. actually the only time the game isnt run and gun is if you spawn 5 miles from the battle and have to run there
and overall, the game feels cheap. it doesnt feel a whole lot better than Battlefield 1943 which was a pretty lame downloadable game. it doesnt feel refined at all to me
maybe just my opinion, but i cant wait for MW3.
|
bf3 run and gun?
Everyone I see in bf3 trying to play cod style ends up like 3 - 20
its not possible because PC players are adapting to the game mechanics and learning to hold positions for defence and positioning for offense.
Its great when you have a game like that because there is so much team work involved and makes the game 100x intense.
I have had tons of games where 1 or 2 really good squads tear up the entire game by slowing clearing important areas and not rushing it.
BTW
for the server is it possible to implement stats just for the server?