View Single Post
Old 10-31-2011, 10:38 AM   #1263
AWDTurboLuvr
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
AWDTurboLuvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montreal
Posts: 590
Thanked 324 Times in 144 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 737! View Post
Focusing samples Nikon 16-85 vs 18-200 vs Sigma 18-50 f2.8: Nikon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review

i think i would go with the 17-50. it has fixed 2.8 too. it shouldnt be too heavy, i had a 17-70 a while back and it was pretty light
I ended up with the 17-50. Mounted on the D90, it was felt pretty good and it was handy to have the 2.8 aperture in low-light situations. I'll post some pics later on the other thread.
__________________
"Happiness lies in the joy of achievement and the thrill of creative effort"
AWDTurboLuvr is offline   Reply With Quote