View Single Post
Old 12-01-2011, 10:59 PM   #13243
Senna4ever
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
ISO 8000, 30seconds, @ f3.5

The D3000 sucks. It's so noisy with anything other than direct sunlight. If you're gonna do a lot of low light you might as well get the D3100, D5100, or D7000. Their ability of their sensors help tremendously in low light situations. I shot that w/ my D7000.

Of if you're rich, get the D3s ISO 12800 no problem!!!!! I think the D3s @ 10,000 ISO is less noisy than the D3000 at 800, no joke.
Nikon cameras are not as good as Canon DSLRs for astrophotography, as the Sony sensors used in Nikons actually process part of the RAW file on the chip before it gets written to whatever storage medium being used - you never get a true RAW file with Nikons. This can introduce noise & unwanted artifacts to the image. Most people may not notice, but astronomers will notice.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote