Quote:
Originally Posted by StylinRed
that doesn't mean that in those situations women wouldn't be allowed to abort
its just like canada abortion was illegal until trudeau allowed it for women solely in those situations
Ron Paul would simply allow states to choose just like how states are allowed to choose now (hence this vote that you are citing) but even if personhood was defined as such it doesnt mean that women facing situations as discussed wouldnt be allowed to abort
that's why there are always clauses "fine print" * etc etc
|
Stated are not allowed to choose. If the referendum would have passed The federal government would have got involved just like they are with Arizona's imagination laws. This would have ended up in the supreme court. The Supreme court has already decided on the right to have an abortion. The referendum and the following aftermath would just be a big waste of tax payers money. If states laws trumped the supreme court it would cause total cause in the legal system.