Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic!
So let's not find out who did it. You think that's a good way to run a country?
|
His organization probably knows who wrote it. Being the chief executive/head of the organization, it is his duty to take blame.
Just like any other head of an organization, the sole responsibility of blame or praise is directed towards the top executive - especially the negative outcomes. In this case, yes it is an excellent way to run an organization when you don't use scapegoats.
Now is it best for his campaign to go public on the subordinate who wrote the actual paper or the lower level editors who let this pass ? If you do a cost/benefit analysis on this, it's best to just be consistent with what RP's been saying all along. He acknowledges the mistake, and disavows the message. He also has the most organized campaign out of all the GOP candidates, I'm sure this tells you that he's improved his organizational and leadership skills over the years. But to some, this still may not be enough improvement.