View Single Post
Old 02-03-2012, 12:14 PM   #6583
4444
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blkgsr View Post
ah ok

maybe i read this wrong or don't quite understand it, but did you see the values they were putting towards the minerals in the report?

gold at $1075.00/oz
copper at $ 2.50/lb
silver at $ 16.10/oz
moly at $ 17.00/lb

those are very low numbers, which obviously makes it way better with todays current prices
this is pretty standard for mining companies to use these long term prices when modelling - one could argue that today's prices are part of a short term bump and that long term they will revert to the above (although gold has no reversionary tendancies as copper does)

NI43-101 NPV and real world value do not go hand in hand, just look at what companies are being bought for vs their 43-101 report NPVs
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote