Quote:
Originally Posted by m3thods
Are there any glaring issues with the Canon 10-22 aside from price? From what I understand (from reading reviews) the major issues with each of the usual suspects are the following:
Sigma 10-20: not sharp, some flare issues
Tokina 11-16: limited range, some really big flare issues
Canon 10-22: price is absurd, build quality is much worse than the previous 2
I'm partial to the 10-20/10-22 because of the extended focal length compared to the Tokina, plus the difference between 10 and 11mm is significant imo. I'm expecting a fairly good tax return, so hopefully money won't be an issue when I need to purchase a UWA.
Any thoughts?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever
The Canon 10-22 is somewhat soft unless it's stopped down quite a bit. I think it's too pricey for its performance.
|
I have the 10-22 and have to agree that it is a little on the softer side wide open, I got mine for about $600 pretty much brand new so I can't complain too much. Otherwise I would've spend my money on the Tokina.
I do love my Canon 10-22 on my crop though. It's definitely one of my most fun lens. I rarely find the need for anything faster than f4.