View Single Post
Old 02-22-2012, 03:37 PM   #477
MindBomber
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,888
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrPcAo View Post
I agree with you for the most part, but giving a VI for everyone that has HID's in reflector housings...?

I mean I can think of a couple cars that came from the factory with HID's in reflector housings (Escalade, new Forester, Acura CL's and older TL's... etc), should those people get VIs too?

I mean HID's in reflector housing will never be as good as projectors, that's almost a fact, although it can be done with minimal glare if the owner doesn't only put in the HID's and call it a day, but also modify the light shield until it's closest to the original cutoff.
People are given tickets for HIDs endlessly, they're ineffective and stepping up the consequences would change that.

When I say HIDs in reflector housings, I am referring to cars that came with halogen reflector housings stock, since those are the vehicles that cause issues.


Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfGang View Post
ill rephrase it.

Life is full of problems WE CANT FIX, so just learn to cope with them.

you like to resolve problems?? k then contact everyone in BC that has hids in reflector housings and get them to take it out.
If the public is vocal about the hazard created by illegally installed HIDs, enforcement will increase and curtail the problem.
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: