View Single Post
Old 10-13-2012, 09:40 AM   #229
ToddPacker
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: computer
Posts: 111
Thanked 444 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 163 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
The 403s in the back cost like 400 too right?

EDIT: $465 from epaulet for CXL

dayummmmm $465.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6793026 View Post
call me cheap Todd, but as nice or as much as they are an "investment" piece (TONS of girls say their purses are "investments pieces"are BS to me, even if they are time pieces for watches...) i'm going to have to go with look alike....
That was definitely not my intention if I came across as calling you cheap. I made the mistake of assuming you wanted the actual pairs listed and hence I mentioned the front row of shoes itself are $1000+. I don't think anyone should spend money on materialistic goods such as clothing if it isn't AFFORDABLE to your budget.

With that said, "investment" pieces are realistic in the sense of Cost-Per-Wear.

Total cost of the item/ estimated number of days you’ll wear it = the cost per wear

Value, not low prices should be your focus when budget shopping. Remember a bargain is only a bargain if you actually wear it. Or if it's made of cheap quality as well.


edit: see if you'd be interested in OCS M1 desert boots for this fall, i'll sell it at a discount for a fellow fashionbrah. http://www.revscene.net/forums/67448...D-sz-44-a.html

Last edited by ToddPacker; 10-13-2012 at 09:48 AM.
ToddPacker is offline   Reply With Quote