[hk20000]

Originally Posted by bobbinka

what is considered reasonable and prudent on the bridge? on the main road? on a side street? your definition of reasonable and prudent is not the same as someone else's. you seem to have that problem solved by asking slower drivers to allow faster vehicles to past. but you ALSO state that when traffic is moving much faster than the speed limit, it is safer to drive at the speed of traffic flow. by this logic, the fastest driver on the road will always be the one who sets the pace and all slower drivers should follow him/her

if some idiot was going 100km down a road with a 50km speed limit, should the rest of traffic also follow at that speed because then it would be safer? or is that not considered reasonable and prudent?

in the end, the ultimate question is "what do YOU think the speed limit should be on every single road that exists?" because that is essentially what you are getting at, that whatever you feel is reasonable and prudent should also go for everyone else.

"people who drive slower than me are idiots, and people who drive faster than me are maniacs" - does that sound like you?

Wow this got totally off topic quickly. Read what you typed and read the title of the thread.