|
I liked my 300mm f4 and it was great to get in closer when I was capturing photos of birds but no VR sucks and f2.8 would allow a little more light. But then again you guys have way better camera bodies which allow for higher ISO settings and have no grain visible if you need to brighten the image up without sacrificing shutter speeds.
If I had a job I would purchase the 300mm f2.8 VR but the 70-200mm f2.8 VR with a teleconverter would be a pretty good lens as well. Keep in mind that I'm no where near an expert so anyone else and Senna will know better.
|