View Single Post
Old 01-13-2013, 12:56 AM   #9
StylinRed
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,699
Thanked 10,404 Times in 3,923 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
at that price range


if you wanted something flashy and better than Beats

Sennheiser Momentum


B&W P5



Philips Fiedlio





But I read that these are even better cans, just not as flashy


Sennheiser Amperior



Beyerdynamic dt1350




V moda 80


^^ and that last one costs half as much as the others





as for your Mixr being better this is a review on the SQ by head-fi.org

Quote:
Sound: Like the build and style, the Mixr's sound is an attempt to make a cheaper headphone that is very similar to the Pro: Less all-consuming bass than the Solo or Studio, more mids, and less harsh highs. However, it didn't bring the clarity of the Pro along to the party. Since the $400 Pros sound about equal clarity-wise than a $125 Ultrasone HFI-580, the $250 Mixr definitely don't live up to their price range.

They sound like an on-ear XB500 with more veil, or a Klipsch Image One with a bit less bass and more mud. Soundstage is near-nonexistent, the bass is an ill-defined mess (if a quieter ill-defined mess than other models), and while the mids are more forward they still lack any detail.


Overall, they're just another ripoff courtesy of Beats Electroincs.
http://www.head-fi.org/t/599345/beat...st-impressions
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: