Right, so if there is such a massive discrepancy, and there is no physical way of your car damaging anything above her bumper, then why did ICBC approve $3000 worth of damages - this is your main point when you pursue your complaint...
It makes more sense now - good luck with your thing.
I know this suggestion is overplayed, but if things don't work out, try submitting a story to the media. There was one recently about ICBC approving bogus claims.
Here's the story, and a quote:
Quote:
The fired employees allegedly violated ICBC policies by approving repair estimates from at least one auto body shop over the phone, rather than in person. Policies require an in-person authorization and visual examination to ensure that repair businesses aren’t padding or inflating their estimates.
Drivers involved in accidents usually take their vehicles to claims centres, where staff estimators review the damage, make an estimate and hand drivers a list of approved repair shops.
But drivers can also take their vehicles directly to approved ICBC Valet Service repair shops, but an ICBC estimator still must go personally to inspect the damage and approve the estimate.
|
ICBC fires 6 estimators for repair shortcuts - British Columbia - CBC News
See, in there, it sais ICBC policy is to have physical proof. Always.