View Single Post
Old 01-23-2013, 12:08 AM   #115
Graeme S
The Lone Wanderator
 
Graeme S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 12,091
Thanked 4,385 Times in 1,138 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 75 Posts
If you listen to what he says, though, he's talking about a balance between the framerate and the amount of tape it would have taken; his arguments are fairly compelling.

Yes, high-speed cameras existed. Yes, the capacity for filming 143 minutes existed...but to fake 143 minutes using high-speed film without a single cut, dust speck or any other flaw? And then to repeat it four more times at a higher frame rate again, completely flawlessly?
Graeme S is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: