B.C. Green Party pitches 'guaranteed livable income' - British Columbia - CBC News
Greens contribute to their spending plans.
Quote:
The B.C. Green Party is pledging to introduce a "guaranteed livable income" aimed at eliminating poverty if elected in May.
“We can eliminate poverty, but the only way we can do that is through a guaranteed livable income,” party leader Jane Sterk said today in Victoria.
B.C. Green Party Leader Jane Sterk says poverty is a societal issue, not an individual one. (CBC)
“When Green MLAs are elected, we will either introduce a bill or support a bill from the government to explore through an expert commission, an expert panel, how we could implement a guaranteed livable income in British Columbia — a made-in-B.C. guaranteed livable income.
"We know that at the moment there is a lot of cost in sustaining people in poverty. Those costs are borne in the number of ministries that a family has to navigate, in the number of programs that the government offers.”
Sterk said it’s time to rethink how the province approaches social services, and focus on moving people out of the cycle of poverty.
BC VOTES 2013The latest from the campaign
“We need to stop just tweaking our social services and to start really addressing the issue that people are most concerned about, which is the amount of poverty that we have in British Columbia,” she said.
“We know that families and individuals in British Columbia who are caught in the cycle of poverty have really no hope in exiting that cycle and certainly tweaking the system that we have now with small amounts of money is not going to solve the problem.”
Sterk called on the province to reduce the number of ministries and bureaucrats, which she says could leave enough money to fund the guaranteed livable income.
She said the provincial government should focus on funding childcare and housing for low-income families, as well as providing parenting classes and skills training.
“Right now we spend an awful lot of money keeping people in the system, keeping people in the poverty cycle — $1 million a day on the Downtown Eastside is spent in the poverty industry, with no appreciable positive effect on the people of the Downtown Eastside,” she said.
B.C. VOTES 2013How do your views fit into B.C.'s political landscape?
“We spend $40,000 a year keeping a child in government care, and many of those children are removed from families who live in poverty … and that’s often the result of the stress of living in poverty.”
Sterk said the party would use Statistics Canada’s low-income threshold, which varies depending on the size of the family and the community, and ensure no family lives below that line.
“We don’t see things like poverty as a societal thing. We see them as individual. And it’s very easy for us to point to an individual and say, ‘I would never end up there’ or, ‘You got there because of your own decisions’ rather than understanding that poverty is multi-generational … and it is really a societal issue,” she said.
“I think we’re at a cusp where we’re recognizing that things aren’t working and that we do need to change our mind and do things differently.”
|
You can do a lot of things in a controlled setting, that you can't in a real world, province wide situation.
If you could stop all immigration, from within Canada and outside...then you can say, "we have 50,000 people to feed." If you could have revenues that never fluctuated, then you can say, "we will feed 50,000 people with 50 million a year" Unfortunately, we have neither.
Anyone that wants to add an expense...any expense, will find a way to make it happen. Spending the money isn't the hard part...you just say yes. But when you hit a recession, or an economic collapse, or what have you, then you are now responsible for excess spending-and your budget problems compound.