|
I'm actually for GMOs. A lot of people in the world cannot afford, or even grow their food. With GMOs it gives people who have harsher climates a wider variety of foods available as well as keeping food cheap. (Relatively) In addition, a lot of agriculture today isn't grown for consumption but for fuel. (Corn for example) GMOs help this process by growing things faster, that are also resistance to drought or disease. We no longer live in a time where a slight change in climate forces half the population to starve.
However, I am against the non-ethical control of GMOs by corporations. GMOs as an idea is great, but it is the implementation that gets tricky. Technically, selective breeding is a form of GMO. At what point is a GMO no longer a living organism but just a product?
TLDR: Not against GMOs but against the unethical deployment of GMOs.
|