REVscene Automotive Forum - View Single Post

Sunfighter · 10-05-2013, 11:46 PM

When I had my tuned WRX STI my experiences and mileage (no pun intended) varied drastically based on source/octane.

My preferences were;

-Petro Canada 94 (I REALLY miss this being an option!)
-Chevron 94

I ran US Chevron 92 countless times but never noticed a difference between this and Canadian 94 so I find it very interesting that so many people in this thread do.

Mileage was comparable and performance was nearly identical.

I HATED Husky 94. It was AWFUL....

Not only did I genuinely take a 15-20% hit in fuel economy (I did the math on this) but it felt like I had an extra 500lbs in the car with me based on power delivery, etc...

For the bike I prefer :

-Chevron 94
-Shell 91
-Petro Canada 91

10-05-2013, 11:46 PM	#76
Sunfighter 2-Wheelin' Mod Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Burnaby Posts: 3,404 Thanked 994 Times in 425 Posts Failed 4 Times in 2 Posts Member's Picture Albums	When I had my tuned WRX STI my experiences and mileage (no pun intended) varied drastically based on source/octane. My preferences were; -Petro Canada 94 (I REALLY miss this being an option!) -Chevron 94 I ran US Chevron 92 countless times but never noticed a difference between this and Canadian 94 so I find it very interesting that so many people in this thread do. Mileage was comparable and performance was nearly identical. I HATED Husky 94. It was AWFUL.... Not only did I genuinely take a 15-20% hit in fuel economy (I did the math on this) but it felt like I had an extra 500lbs in the car with me based on power delivery, etc... For the bike I prefer : -Chevron 94 -Shell 91 -Petro Canada 91 __________________ ROOGP Long Live the King : RIP John (Gwilo)