View Single Post
Old 02-14-2014, 05:58 AM   #2368
m3thods
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
m3thods's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
DSLR is definitely better if you're making bigger prints, but if it's for an ecommerce site using web-sized pictures you can get away with m4/3ds or even a premium point and shoot. Though in your case if this is going to be used 90+% in a studio setting then I'd probably go with a budget dslr for the sake of an easier time with studio lighting.

I'm no lighting expert, so I can't really comment. If I'm correct to assume that it's mostly for studio work, then I'd probably spend more money here as it'll make a bigger difference to your proposed needs than your camera imo.

Again, if it's mostly for a studio setting, I'd go cheap body/kit (T2i/T3i) and macro (efs 60). The kit lens will cover wide focal lengths and video. The macro would be a versatile option for full item shots, as well as details when you need them. Maybe throw in a tripod to keep your product shots looking consistent.

Theoretically, you could also get something like a G-series camera from Canon and still have access to wireless triggers like Pocketwizards and Yongnuos for lighting. I may be wrong, but the G-series has a hotshoe not unlike the Canon dslrs, so I'm pretty sure it would work. You could probably get an older G12+ for dirt cheap. That would take care of your lens and body cost, leaving you much more for lighting. These guys will also shoot your "here-and-there" video when you need it, but obviously a G-series won't be as accommodating to changing needs (read: you can't change the lens on it) as a dslr would.
m3thods is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: