View Single Post
Old 04-02-2014, 10:56 PM   #829
4444
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: not vancouver
Posts: 2,642
Thanked 1,941 Times in 765 Posts
Failed 532 Times in 202 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma View Post
I'd wanna know, but then i'd already know. i'd know the plane is gone and whoever was related to me was gone too. and that's enough.

at a different scale. it's like if your friend got in a gruesome car crash. his body and face are completely mangled. but all you know is "fatal car crash"... wouldn't you wanna now EXACTLY what happened? was his skull crushed? did he bleed to death? was he knocked out RIGHT away? you can always get more detailed.

some people ... most people would be good just knowing he's dead. but would u really wanna see his body? see his face? hear the corners report in full? watch the corner perform? i mean those are "knowing for sure".

it's the same... they say the plane crashed. they drowned. do you really need to know the exact details? lost at sea is pretty decent to me. lost at sea or find a bloated body. i duno man. details aren't necessary.
wow, i didn't expect such a dumb response from you:

i wouldn't want to see nasty photos or details of their last moments, but i'd want to know why the plane went down, who was responsible, was it just a freak of nature, was it terrorism, was it a 1 in a million mechanical fault, were they knocked unconscious due to lack of oxygen (what you'd hope, so they'd know nothing).

also, you really think they'd have drowned? a 777 going down, and you think drowning would have killed them? they'd be so lucky to have a chance of drowning vs. being killed on impact.

again, i expect more from you, given previous intelligent thought
4444 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by: